Litigation can be an expensive and time-consuming process for both plaintiffs and defendants. When disputes escalate to court, legal fees, court costs, and the uncertainty of trial outcomes can make settlement an attractive option. The main thing to learn here is when and why defendants use an offer of judgment in civil cases.
An offer of judgment in civil cases becomes a crucial tool, allowing defendants to encourage settlement while mitigating financial risks.
In civil litigation, defendants often use an Offer of Judgment to encourage settlement and avoid prolonged legal battles. Under Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this mechanism allows a defendant to make a written offer to settle the case under specified terms before trial.
If the plaintiff accepts, the court enters judgment accordingly. If the plaintiff rejects the offer and later receives a less favorable judgment, they may be responsible for post-offer costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees in some cases.
This approach effectively reduces the defendant’s litigation costs while encouraging settlement before trial.
Understanding Rule 68 Offer of Judgment
A Rule 68 Offer of Judgment serves as a strategic tool in settlement negotiations. It is a written offer that a party defending against a claim presents to the opposing party at least 14 days prior to trial. If the offer is accepted, the court enters judgment on the terms outlined.
However, if the plaintiff rejects the offer and the final ruling is less favorable, the plaintiff may not recover attorney’s fees or certain court costs that accrued after the offer was made
Rule 68 aims to substantially reduce litigation by shifting the risk of paying post-offer costs onto the plaintiff if they reject an offer that turns out to be more beneficial than the final judgment. This incentivizes careful assessment of pre-offer settlement terms to avoid financial pitfalls.
Why Defendants Make an Offer of Judgment
Defendants use Rule 68 Offers to substantially reduce litigation costs and encourage settlement. In cases where a defendant anticipates a costly trial, offering a reasonable settlement can prevent the accrual of excessive attorneys’ fees and court costs.
It also applies pressure on the plaintiff to carefully evaluate their chances of securing a more favorable judgment at trial.
If the plaintiff chooses to proceed and does not obtain a better outcome, they are responsible for their own costs then accrued post-offer, which could result in a significant financial burden.
Costs and Attorneys’ Fees in a Rule 68 Offer
Under Rule 68, the prevailing party is not always entitled to all the costs incurred. If the plaintiff rejects the offer and fails to obtain a more favorable outcome, they are responsible for the defendant’s costs incurred after the offer was made. This includes:
- Court costs
- Defendant’s attorneys’ fees (if permitted under the underlying statute)
- Other litigation expenses
- These costs may include expert witness fees in some cases.
While the rule defines costs to include standard court fees, some statutes allow for broader interpretation, particularly in civil rights cases under Title VII and the Civil Rights Act.
The ability to recover attorney’s fees depends on the specific lawsuit and whether the applicable statute permits fee shifting.
Rule 68 in Federal Court Cases
Federal court cases involving the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Title VII, and the Civil Rights Act frequently involve Rule 68 offers.
Since these laws allow for the recovery of attorneys’ fees, a defendant makes an offer to prevent excessive fee awards if the plaintiff does not secure a more favorable judgment. However, not all statutes permit the shifting of attorneys’ fees under Rule 68.
Courts carefully examine whether the offer of judgment aligns with the underlying statute governing the claim.
Key Considerations for Plaintiffs and Defendants
- Pre-Offer vs. Post-Offer Costs:
The court defines costs to include those incurred after the offer when determining recoverable expenses.
- Unaccepted Offers Are Considered Withdrawn:
If the plaintiff does not accept within the specified timeframe, the offer is considered withdrawn and cannot be used as an admission of liability.
- Public Record Implications:
A Rule 68 judgment becomes part of the public record, which may impact a company’s credit or reputation.
- Subsequent Offers:
Defendants can make a subsequent offer if an earlier 68 offer of judgment is rejected.
- Effect on Settlement Negotiations:
A Rule 68 offer can alter the dynamic of ongoing settlement discussions, as the risk of cost-shifting makes the trial a less attractive option.
When Should a Plaintiff Accept a Rule 68 Offer?
A plaintiff should evaluate an Offer of Judgment based on several factors:
- The likelihood of obtaining a more favorable judgment at trial
- The risk of paying court costs and defendant’s fees
- The strength of such claims under the relevant statute
- The impact of a public record judgment
- Whether the notice of acceptance is in the best financial interest of the plaintiff
- How the offer compares to standard settlement offers
- Whether the potential favorable judgment is worth the risk of litigation
Since a rejected offer can preclude the plaintiff from recovering certain costs, you need to know what to do. It is crucial to analyze the financial implications of moving forward with the trial. Acceptance might be a strategic decision if the potential damages are less than the defendant’s offer,
What Happens After a Plaintiff Accepts or Rejects?
If a plaintiff accepts, a written notice of acceptance is filed. Then, the court enters judgment accordingly. Once entered, the plaintiff receives the agreed-upon money and the case is resolved without further proceedings.
Moreover, if the plaintiff rejects, the offer is considered withdrawn, and the case proceeds to trial. If the final ruling is less favorable, the plaintiff becomes responsible for costs incurred after the offer, which may significantly impact their financial outcome.
Final Thoughts
A Rule 68 Offer of Judgment can be a powerful tool in civil litigation. It is used to preclude unnecessary costs, encourage settlement, and manage risks. Both plaintiffs and defendants must carefully consider the financial and legal consequences before making or rejecting an offer.
How This Understanding Might Help
Understanding civil procedure and litigation strategies helps parties handle settlement negotiations. Moreover, it can help achieve the most favorable judgment possible.
In such cases, working with experienced legal counsel is essential. The council helps in making an informed decision that minimizes risks while maximizing potential recovery.
As litigation costs continue to rise, Rule 68 offers an effective means of resolving disputes efficiently while mitigating financial exposure for both sides.
However, if you feel like you need more guidance with this, our professionals at Bourassa Law Group can guide you all about it. We ensure all your concerns are heard and you get the assistance you deserve.
1-800-870-8910