Estate planning is one of the most important steps you can take to protect your assets and ensure your loved ones receive their rightful inheritance. However, certain red flags in your estate plan could lead to legal battles, putting your family through probate court and opening the door for challenges from other family members. If your estate planning documents appear suspicious, family members may question their validity and challenge the will in court.
Recognizing potential legal red flags can help prevent will contests and ensure your wishes are honored. In this guide, we’ll explore the most common grounds for contesting a will, how improper execution can undermine your entire estate plan, and what steps you can take to avoid these pitfalls.
1. Lack of Testamentary Capacity
One of the most common reasons a last will is contested is the testator’s (the individual creating the will) lack of testamentary capacity. A person making a will must have the requisite capacity to understand the nature of their assets, their beneficiaries, and the consequences of their decisions. If age, substance abuse, or illness such as cognitive decline impairs a testator’s mental capacity, interested parties can challenge their will in court.
Warning Signs of Lack of Capacity:
The testator struggles to recognize family members or remember personal property details.
Difficulty understanding the nature and consequences of their estate planning decisions.
Medical records indicating cognitive impairment at the time of execution.
Estate law requires testators to create wills while of sound mind. If evidence suggests otherwise, lawyers may call expert witnesses, such as doctors or psychologists, to assess mental capacity.
2. Undue Influence or Improper Influence
Undue influence occurs when someone pressures a vulnerable testator to change their estate planning documents against their true intentions. This can happen when a person in a position of trust manipulates the testator for their gain.
Red Flags Indicating Undue Influence:
The testator was isolated from other family members.
A new will heavily favors one beneficiary, cutting out long-standing heirs.
The person benefiting from the will was involved in its creation.
Courts examine situations where undue influence compromised the testator’s free will, particularly when the influencer had significant control over them. To challenge a will, the contestant must present evidence that the deceased person was under improper influence when making the document.
3. Improper Execution of Estate Planning Documents
For an estate plan to be valid, it must meet strict legal requirements. Improper execution can render the entire estate plan invalid. Different states have specific rules regarding the presence of witnesses, notarization, and the signing process.
Common Mistakes in Execution:
The will was not signed in the presence of witnesses.
The document lacks the required signatures.
Witnesses were not legally qualified.
Failure to follow these legal formalities can leave the estate plan vulnerable to challenges, delaying asset distribution and increasing legal costs. To mitigate these risks, a well-drafted estate plan must adhere to all legal requirements.
4. Fraud or Forgery
Fraudulent wills occur when someone tricks a testator into signing an unintended document or forges their signature. This is a serious legal violation and a strong ground for a will contest.
Signs of Fraud in Estate Planning:
The testator was misled about the nature of the document.
Signatures on the will appear inconsistent with previous signatures.
Witnesses recall suspicious circumstances surrounding the will’s execution.
If fraud is suspected, handwriting experts and legal professionals can help determine the authenticity of the document.
5. Unexplained Sudden Changes in the Will
While updating a will is normal, sudden drastic changes without explanation can raise suspicions. If a new will disinherits long-time beneficiaries or significantly alters distributions, family members may challenge its validity.
Factors That Raise Suspicions:
The testator was in poor health when the changes were made.
The person benefiting from the changes had access to the testator’s estate planning documents.
A sudden change in a will that contradicts the testator’s previously expressed intentions.
6. The Testator Was Under Duress or Coercion
A valid estate plan must be created freely. If a testator was threatened or coerced into making decisions they wouldn’t have otherwise, the will can be contested.
Examples of Coercion:
A caregiver threatening to withhold care unless they are included in the will.
A family member pressuring the testator to exclude others.
Emotional manipulation leading to unfair distribution of assets.
Proving coercion requires evidence such as witness testimonies or written communications that indicate forced decision-making.
7. Conflicts Between Multiple Wills
If multiple wills exist, determining which one is valid can be complicated. The latest properly executed will typically prevail, but inconsistencies can lead to legal battles.
What Courts Consider in Will Contests:
The presence of clear revocation clauses in new wills.
The testator’s mental capacity at the time of each will’s creation.
Any evidence of undue influence or fraud.
To avoid confusion, estate planning should be done under the guidance of an attorney who ensures previous wills are properly revoked.
8. Unequal Treatment of Beneficiaries Without Explanation
While a testator has the right to distribute assets as they wish, significantly favoring one beneficiary without explanation can lead to disputes.
Issues That Can Lead to Challenges:
One family member receives the majority of the estate with no clear reason.
Previous promises or expectations are disregarded.
The testator did not communicate changes to the beneficiaries.
Including a letter of intent alongside the will can clarify the testator’s reasoning and help prevent disputes.
9. The Executor Has a Conflict of Interest
The person responsible for managing the estate must act in the best interest of all beneficiaries. If an executor has conflicts of interest, it can lead to legal disputes.
Red Flags in Executor Selection:
The executor benefits personally from their decisions.
The executor has a history of financial misconduct.
The executor fails to act transparently with beneficiaries.
A neutral and trustworthy executor reduces the risk of disputes and ensures a smooth estate administration process.
10. Lack of Legal Guidance in Estate Planning
Creating an estate plan without legal guidance increases the risk of errors that could lead to a will contest. It is crucial to consult an attorney to navigate the process properly. Even small mistakes can cause major legal complications, delaying asset distribution and leading to costly court battles.
Why Professional Legal Assistance Is Essential:
Estate attorneys ensure all documents comply with estate law.
Legal guidance prevents unintended disinheritance or tax issues.
Proper estate planning minimizes disputes and ensures that assets are distributed as intended.
Safeguard Your Estate Plan With Bourassa Group
An estate plan should protect your assets and provide clarity for your loved ones. However, improper execution, undue influence, and lack of testamentary capacity can lead to challenges in court. To safeguard your wishes, consult a legal professional to ensure compliance with estate laws and minimize the risk of disputes.
If you need to create or review your estate plan, Bourassa Law Group is here to help. Contact us today for a free consultation and let our experienced team help you navigate this process.
1-800-870-8910